We are the nation of a fixed
income country. Most proportion of financial savings and investments of Indians
are in fixed income avenues as dominating by bank deposits and various
government small savings schemes like PPF and National Savings Certificates
(NSC). Because, we love for fixed and predictable returns which has somewhat
less-ended in recent decades. But we
should know that the scope of gains is sharply limited in fixed income
instruments as compared to investing in equities and could not able to beat
inflation rate. However, being a relatively high inflation economy, still we
are not ready to switch to equity more enthusiastically than we have done so.
The primary reason is that this
is actually a circular problem. Because inflation is high, fixed returns are
also high. We get 8, 10, or even 12 per cent from different kinds of deposits. Ironically,
these returns are low in real terms but the headline number is big. It creates
an illusion, false impression, that you are earning a lot of money. In reality,
getting 10 per cent when inflation is 9 per cent is no different from getting 5
per cent while inflation is 4 percent. Thus, paradoxically, higher inflation
makes fixed income look more lucrative.
Understanding
the effect of Inflation Rate
We understand that each year’s
inflation occurs on top of the previous year’s inflation, it means that the
effect is just like of compound interest. Consider a situation where you invest
Rs1 lakh in a bank deposit which earns you 8 per cent a year. At the same time,
the prices are also generally rising at the same rate of 8 percent a year. In
such situation, your compounding returns will just about keep pace with
inflation.
The actual amount will increase
but what you can do with it would not. So, for example, over ten years your Rs1
lakh will become Rs2.16 lakh. However, at the same time, on an average the
things you could buy for Rs1 lakh will also cost Rs2.16 lakh. In effect, you
have not become any richer. The purchasing power of your Rs1 lakh is still Rs1
lakh despite keeping it in the bank deposits. But inflation may not be so
kind as to stay at the level of the interest you are earning, What if it’s
more? And what if, this goes on for a very long time.
Suppose, your returns are 8 per cent but inflation stays at 10 per cent and twenty years go by?Your investment would grow to Rs4.66 lakh but things that used to cost Rs 1 lakh would now cost Rs6.72 lakh. Now, the purchasing power of your Rs1 lakh is just Rs69,000. Your investment has actually made you poorer.
Suppose, your returns are 8 per cent but inflation stays at 10 per cent and twenty years go by?Your investment would grow to Rs4.66 lakh but things that used to cost Rs 1 lakh would now cost Rs6.72 lakh. Now, the purchasing power of your Rs1 lakh is just Rs69,000. Your investment has actually made you poorer.
This is not theoretical
problem, it’s happening all the time to crores of Indian. Our tendency for
using bank deposits and other fixed-return investments is the cause of this
problem. The problem is especially severe for retired people who depend on
long-term deposits for income.
Realistic
definition of Long Term
There are a lot of anti-equity
talks all around. People get angry while recommending equities for the long
term. They could not wait for ten years. So, it is hard to convince too many
investors that investing in an equity fund or starting an SIP is worthwhile in
long duration. They typically complain that even SIP of four years in a typical
fund has three or four per cent returns. Rationally, four year is not an
adequate period of time for equity of SIP.
This is nicely illustrated by
calculating how such an investment would work out had the SIP been started
earlier. If a SIP had started six year ago instead of four, it would have had
returns of 8.5 per cent p.a. Had it been started eight years ago, the returns
would have been 11 per cent per annum and had it been started ten years ago, it
would have been 16 per cent p.a. This last rate of return corresponds to a 440
per cent total growth over a decade.
Twelve years would have brought returns of 22 per cent p.a. And, we
think that at least, these are certainly not unreasonable such long periods of
time. The superlative returns are generated for those investors who have
sustained uninterrupted SIPs in equity fund for more than a decade and have
switched the actual fund as their quality varies but have never stopped the
monthly investment.
Hence, this apparently magical
power of long-term compounding and cost averaging on a volatile asset has to be
experienced to be believed. We now have the basic principles on which our
argument is based. Equity has the potential to deliver growth which is over and
above that the inflation rate is, while fixed income investments can deliver
only the same of return aligned with the inflation rate.
Long
run Investments for Growth
It is now time for saver can
either adopt the approach of just storing the money in a deposits is unlikely
to grow it any significant manner or he
can make it work at the only reliable way of growing his savings at rate faster
than that of inflation is to invest it into equity or equity based investments.
On an average, equity tends to grow at least at the same real rate at which the
economy is growing.
If you track the markets every
day, you will get many ups and downs. If you track it once in a few years,
there will be fewer ups and downs. Returns from equity are not only high but
also safe in the long run. If you have had the logic of investing is
impeccable, and yet the action is missing. Then, we are sorry, here but that’s
the world is like. And even that is the length of business cycle.
I do hope when I would write
blog in October 2014, then I would not have to try so hard to convince readers
of this eternal truth of investing.
2 comments:
Respected Sir,
Its one of the best article explaining the IMPORTANCE of 1) Long-term Investing as well as 2) investing in EQUITY...
Keep up the good work :-)
Thanks sir.
Post a Comment